Exploring the Complexity of Feminist Beliefs: Gender, Education, and Mother's Work Status as Predictors

Authors

  • Dr. Ifra Iftikhar Lahore Garrison University
  • Mudassar Hussain Lahore Garrison University
  • Humayun Sattar Lahore Garrison University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58932/MULA0003

Keywords:

Feminist beliefs, mother's employment, women's political engagement, gender equality, political leadership

Abstract

This study examines how age, education, gender, and mother's employment position affect feminist ideals, gender equality in political leadership, gender stereotypes, and women's political engagement. Higher education levels indicate stronger feminist views, indicating that education shapes feminist beliefs. Working mothers are more likely to support feminist principles than housewives. Moreover, the findings revealed that women are more likely than males to oppose gender conventions and pursue gender balance in political leadership and institutions. However, relationships may not always be statistically significant, therefore further study is needed to understand the reasons and frequency of these attitudes across both genders. This study illuminates feminist attitudes' complexity, impacted by education, gender, and the mother's job position. The findings highlight the need for further research into the relationship between gender norms, cultural expectations, and feminist ideas, as well as the potential influence of political motivations on individuals' engagement with feminist concepts.

References

Aelst, P. V., & Walgrave, S. (2001). Who is that (wo)man in the street? From normalization of protest to the normalization of the protestor. European Journal of Political Research., 39:461–486. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00582.

Ben-Nun Bloom, P., Gilad, S., & Freedman, M. (2017). Does exposure to other cultures affect the impact of economic globalization on gender equality? International Political Science Review, 38(3), 378-395.

Brush, L. R., Gold, A. R., & White, M. G. (1978). The paradox of intention and effect: A women’s studies course. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society , 3(4), 870–883. doi:10.1086/493544.

Butler, J. (1991). Gender trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cano, T., & Hofmeister, H. (2023). The intergenerational transmission of gender: Paternal influences on children's gender attitudes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 85(1), 193-214.

Cunningham, M., Beutel, A. M., Barber, J. S., & Thornton, A. (2005). Reciprocal Relationships between Attitudes about Gender and Social Contexts during Young Adulthood. Social Science Research, 34 (4): 862–92.

Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies., 56:76–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x.

Davis, S. N. (2007). Gender Ideology Construction from Adolescence to Young Adulthood. Social Science Research, 36 (3): 1021–41. .

De Beauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex. Paris, France: Gallimard.

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Eisele, H., & Stake, J. (2008). The Differential Relationship of Feminist Attitudes and Feminist Identity to Self-Efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(3), 233–244. .

Fan, P.-L., & Marini, M. M. (2000). Influences on Gender-Role Attitudes during the Transition to Adulthood. Social Science Research , 29 (2): 258–83.

Farré, L., & Vella, F. (2013). “The Intergenerational Transmission of Gender Role Attitudes and Its Implications for Female Labour Force Participation. Economica , 80(318): 219–47.

Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Mergl, M. M., Good, G. E., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A. (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development: Studies of convergent, discriminant, and structural validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 15-29.

Fulenwider, C. K. (1981). Feminist Ideology and the Political Attitudes and Participation of White and Minority Women. Political Research Quarterly , 34(1), 17–30.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). . Cengage Learning.

Iqtidar, H. (2011). Secularizing Islamists? Jamaat-i-Islami and Jama`at-ud-Da`wa in Urban Pakistan. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Kyoore, J. E., & Sulemana, I. (2019). Do Educational Attainments Influence Attitudes Toward Gender Equality in Sub-Saharan Africa? Forum for Social Economics , 48(4). DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2018.1509797.

Moen, P., Erickson, M. A., & Dempster-McClain, D. (1997). Their Mother’s Daughters? The Intergenerational Transmission of Gender Attitudes in a World of Changing Roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family , 59 (2): 281–93.

Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002). Feminist Identity Development Measures: Comparing the Psychometrics of Three Instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 30(1):66-86. DOI: 10.1177/0011000002301004.

Nelson, T. D. (2002). Psychology of Prejudice. Pearsons Education, Inc. publishing as Allyn and Bacon.

Noreen, S. (2019). Women in Pakistan as Subjects of Reorm to 'Reformists': A Feminist Historical Analysis of Al-Huda Inernational. Doctoral dissertation, University of Łódź). Retrieved from Central European University.

Osawa, K. (2015). Traditional Gender Norms and Women’s Political Participation: How Conservative Women Engage in Political Activism in Japan. Social Science Japan Journal, 18 (1), 45–61. doi: 10.1093/ssjj/jyu041.

Pattie, C., Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies., 51:443–468. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00435.

Pharr, S. (1981). Political Women in Japan: The Search for a Place in Political Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Rakhshani, S. B. (2021, January 29). Feminism in Pakistan. Pakistan Today, pp. Opinion. https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/01/29/feminism-in-pakistan/.

Rhodebeck, L. A. (1996). The structure of men’s and women’s feminist orientations. Feminist identity and feminist opinions. . Gender & Society, , 10(4), 368–403. doi:10.1177/089124396010004003.

Saigol, R., & Chaudhary, N. U. (2020). Contradictions and Ambiguities of Feminism in Pakistan: Exploring the Fourth Wave. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES).

Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2017). Understanding feminist activism among women: Resources, consciousness, and social networks. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 9, 1–9.

Szymanski, D. M. (2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51(3/4), 145–159. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037759.33014.55.

Weis, A. S., Redford, L., Zucker, A. N., & Ratliff, K. A. (2018). Feminist identity, attitudes toward feminist prototypes, and willingness to intervene in everyday sexist events. . Psychology of Women Quarterly, , 42(3), 279–290. doi:10.1177/0361684318764694.

Yoshiyuki, S., Amano, M., & Nasu, H. (1995). Women’s Seikatsuha Movement: Women who Support the Seikatsu Club. Tokyo: Marujusha.

Youth Department of the Council of Europe. (2023, July 9). Feminism and Women’s Rights Movements. Retrieved from Gender Matters: https://www.coe.int/en/web/gender-matters/feminism-and-women-s-rights-movements

Yu, W.-h., & Lee, P.-l. (2013). Decomposing Gender Beliefs: Cross-National Differences in Attitudes Toward Maternal Employment and Gender Equality at Home. Sociological Inquiry, 83(4). DOI: 10.1111/soin.12013.

Zia, A. S. (2018). Faith and Feminism in Pakistan: Religious Agency or Sexual Autonomy? . Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.

Zia, A. S. (2020). “Who’s Afraid of Pakistan’s Aurat March?”. Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 55, no. 8,.

Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2010). Minding the Gap Between Feminist Identity and Attitudes: The Behavioral and Ideological Divide Between Feminists and Non-Labelers. Journal of Personality , 78(6):1895-924. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00673.x.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Iftikhar, D. I. ., Hussain, M. ., & Sattar, H. . (2023). Exploring the Complexity of Feminist Beliefs: Gender, Education, and Mother’s Work Status as Predictors. Journal of Professional Research in Social Sciences, 10(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.58932/MULA0003

Issue

Section

Articles (English)